Who Are the Most-Connected Venture Capitalist Board Members in the Technology Sector

Who Are the Most-Connected Venture Capitalist Board Members in the Technology Sector?

This research project was carried out to determine who were the “most-connected” venture capitalist board members in the technology sector.  For quite some time, I have wondered if the field of venture capitalism is truly as “inter-connected” as I hear about or read about in newspapers.  For example, I regularly read and heard comments like “Mr. X really has connections in the VC world”.  So I decided to see if these types of statements were really true.

The essence of my research project was to collect data on the boards of directors of all companies that went public during the “dot-com” explosion.  This is based on the premise that venture capitalists that invest a significant amount of money in a company will generally demand a seat on the board of directors of that company when the company goes public.  The board of directors data was entered into a database and networking software [1] was used to calculate the “degrees-of-separation” of each board member.  (For those of you who don’t know what “degrees-of-separation” means, it is the average of the shortest path lengths from one node in a network to all other connected nodes in that network.  So, the node that has the average shortest paths to all other nodes can be considered in some sense to be the “most connected” node in that network.)

After all data was collected, the database contained records of:

·       749 companies that went public in some technology sector on the NASDAQ during the dot-com explosion (I collected data from January, 1998 through October, 2001)

·       4,057 individuals that served on boards of directors of those companies

·       30,412 “connections” that indicated that two individuals served on the same board of directors of some company.

Perhaps the most surprising result was not the actual listing of who were the “most-connected” venture capitalists, but that, of the 4,057 individuals, 2,375, or almost 60% were somehow connected to each other.  (The other 1,682 individuals were connected to smaller groups of interconnected boards, sometimes in groups that only included one company’s board of directors.)

By the way, I presented the results of this research project at an academic information systems conference [2], but only a very small number of people showed up (I’m embarrassed to say the exact number).  Perhaps I didn’t choose an appropriate title for my presentation: “Degrees of Separation as a Measure of Venture Capitalist Board Member Connectedness”.  One of my prior conference presentations [3] on a related topic (determining the level of connectedness of MIS researchers – my own field of education) was much more highly attended, but the title of that presentation was “Kevin Bacon, Degrees of Separation, and MIS Research”.

So, to satisfy your curiosity, the list of the top 100 venture capitalists is (remember, this list is qualified as “venture capitalists who were on boards of directors of companies that went public on the NASDAQ in a technology sector from January, 1998 through October 2001”):

 

Rank

First Name

Middle Name

Last Name

Pre/Suffix

DOS value

1

L

John

Doerr

 

4.5120

2

C

Richard

Kramlich

 

4.6800

3

William

R

Stensrud

 

4.7069

4

Thomas

J

Meredith

 

4.7903

5

John

L

Walecka

 

4.8034

6

David

D

Hiller

 

4.8813

7

Larry

W

Sonsini

 

4.8905

8

William

D

Savoy

 

4.9044

9

Neal

 

Douglas

 

4.9491

10

Scott

 

Kriens

 

4.9638

11

Vinod

 

Khosla

 

4.9697

12

Michael

J

Moritz

 

4.9722

13

Jerome

D

Colonna

 

4.9806

14

Edward

J

Zander

 

4.9827

15

Robert

C

Hawk

 

4.9844

16

Mitchell

E

Kertzman

 

4.9928

17

Irwin

 

Federman

 

4.9966

18

James

W

Breyer

 

4.9971

19

Andrew

W

Verhalen

 

5.0013

20

Mark

 

Tebbe

 

5.0051

21

James

E

Cowie 

 

5.0051

22

Richard

M

Moley

 

5.0114

23

Nancy

J

Schoendorf

 

5.0189

24

Harvey

C

Jones

Jr

5.0202

25

William

R

Hearst

III

5.0219

26

Kevin

R

Compton

 

5.0349

27

Peter

M

Neupert

 

5.0442

28

Howard

D

Schultz

 

5.0627

29

Joseph

A

Graziano

 

5.0707

30

David

M

Beirne

 

5.0745

31

Brook

H

Byers

 

5.0825

32

Tench

 

Coxe

 

5.0897

33

John

G

Taysom

 

5.0909

34

Lawrence

P

Begley

 

5.0964

35

Judith

H

Hamilton

 

5.1078

36

Peter

T

Morris

 

5.1187

37

Donald

J

Listwin

 

5.1225

38

Arthur

C

Patterson

 

5.1326

39

Thomas

J

Casey

 

5.1368

40

Daniel

J

Nova

 

5.1389

41

David

C

Bohnett

 

5.1406

42

William

E

Kelvie

 

5.1427

43

George

R

Garrick

 

5.1457

44

Yogen

K

Dalal

 

5.1512

45

A

Brooke

Seawell

 

5.1600

46

Keith

B

Geeslin

 

5.1659

47

Joseph

B

Costello

 

5.1676

48

Garrett

P

Gruener

 

5.1684

49

Pradeep

 

Sindhu

 

5.1688

50

Christos

M

Cotsakos

 

5.1701

51

William

S

Kaiser

 

5.1718

52

Thomas

A

Jermoluk

 

5.1747

53

James

H

Clark

 

5.1747

54

Tadataka

 

Yamada

MD

5.1747

55

William

W

McGuire

MD

5.1747

56

Michael

K

Hoover

 

5.1747

57

W

Michael

Long

 

5.1747

58

Laura

D'Andrea

Tyson

 

5.1747

59

P

E

Sadler

 

5.1747

60

Robert

E

Davoli

 

5.1756

61

Jeffrey

P

Bezos

 

5.1823

62

Michael

C

Brooks

 

5.1840

63

Catherine

M

Hapka

 

5.1857

64

Reed

E

Hundt

 

5.1891

65

James

C

Gaither

 

5.1891

66

John

R

Oltman

 

5.1962

67

Eric

C

Cooper

 

5.2126

68

Glen

T

Meakem

 

5.2126

69

David

A

Noble

 

5.2126

70

Sam

E

Kinney

Jr

5.2126

71

Andrew

J

Filipowski

 

5.2185

72

Barry

M

Weinman

 

5.2274

73

Robert

J

Zollars

 

5.2299

74

Barry

J

Schiffman

 

5.2316

75

Ronald

A

Weinberg

 

5.2333

76

Bruce

W

Ravenel

 

5.2333

77

John

H

Brandon

 

5.2333

78

John

T

Kernan

 

5.2333

79

Carl

 

Zeiger

 

5.2333

80

Thomas

F

Nagel

 

5.2333

81

Jeffrey

P

Sanderson

 

5.2333

82

Bradley

P

Dusto

 

5.2333

83

Mark

A

Stevens

 

5.2345

84

Eric

C

Hippeau

 

5.2429

85

Daniel

C

Lynch

 

5.2438

86

Jay

C

Hoag

 

5.2442

87

G

Bradford

Jones

 

5.2480

88

Geoffrey

Y

Yang

 

5.2531

89

Paul

D

Carbery

 

5.2547

90

Martin

J

Yudkovitz

 

5.2556

91

Peter

H

Mills

 

5.2573

92

Robert

R

Maxfield

 

5.2674

93

Andrew

S

Rachleff

 

5.2762

94

David

M

Tolmie

 

5.2792

95

Gian

 

Fulgoni

 

5.2792

96

Susan

 

Mayer

 

5.2834

97

Ken

L

Harrison

 

5.2834

98

Richard

W

Shapero

 

5.2842

99

William

J

Razzouk

 

5.2855

100

Thomas

R

Baruch

JD

5.2897

If you are at all familiar with the venture capitalism field, the names on this list should come as no surprise.  However, as someone once told me, getting a Ph.D. is sometimes merely “proving the obvious”.  But as scientists will often tell you, just because something is “obvious” doesn’t mean that it’s true.  So, this research project satisfied my curiosity (and, hopefully, yours as well) about who were the most-connected venture capitalists, using my analytical methodology and dataset.  Perhaps most interestingly, it also showed that the group of venture capitalists is a fairly highly inter-connected group.

If you are interested in the details of the research project, please contact me at: pbeckman@sfsu.edu or 415-338-6240.

REFERENCES

[1] Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Freeman, L.C.  UCINET 5.0 Version 1.00.  Natick: Analytic Technologies, 1999.

[2] Beckman, P. and Gosen, H.  “Degrees of Separation as a Measure of Venture Capitalist Board Member Connectedness”, presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute, Kauai, Hawaii, April 15-19, 2003.

[3] Beckman, P. and Forsman, Å.  “Kevin Bacon, Degrees-of-Separation, and MIS Research Productivity”, HICSS 2002: 255.

© Copyright Paul Beckman, August, 2003.